when i refused to post a comment, i got another comment from the same person (it sounded more like chiding me off) -
are you a pure chinese? he asked... well, my first reaction was -
so what if i am, and so what if i am not... get lost! there is no place in my blog for discrimination. as a gay person, i have known and experienced the effects of being discriminated and marginalised, and all these because the society is a heterosexual/ straight-centric one. put in another words, straight people deemed us glbts, a class different from them and chose to discriminate us (consciously or otherwise). conceptually, this is no different from one deeming another one less pure than himself/ herself. and having experienced being discriminated, i think it would be most inappropriate for me to treat others this way too. so... i reiterate - there is no place for discrimination in my blog. that was my first reaction. after my initial reactions, i reflected further. is there such a thing called "pure chinese"? what does it mean to be "pure" and what does it mean to be "chinese"... i have no answers. both are complex concepts that perhaps has no clear answers at all.
firstly, let's look at the concept of "pure". purity exists only becos there is a reference point from what is deemed "unpure" (or impure, whatever). yet this reference point is vague cos it depends on how one percieves or defines it. in the natural order of the world, there is nothing absolute. and if that is the case, then the whole idea of "purity" fails. no? as an example, let's use the concept of colour - there is no such thing as pure black colour. cos technically, what is deemed pure black colour to us is defined by us based on what we see. and the colour range that we humans see is limited up to a certain point. cos, for what we would traditionally referred to as pure black colour is imaginary cos theoretically, there are blacker tones than black that our human eyes cannot distinguish! no? you can use this same argument for red, blue, yellow, etc...
secondly, the concept of "chinese". when i reflected on this, it reminded me of a documentary series called "the chinese diaspora" that i watched couple of months back. it was an interesting series cos it explored what being "chinese" mean. and it concluded that the concept of "chineseness" is vague and perhaps does not exist. what is "chinese"? how do you define "chinese"? you can't. you cannot possibly have a common defintion! there are just so many ways to define it. by culture, by looks, by language, by lineage, by politics? by nationality? it is simply impossible to do so. is a malaysian-chinese chinese? is a singaporean-chinese chinese? by virtue that i have to throw in the word malaysian or singaporean already tells me that this chinese is not chinese-chinese! even within china, is there such a thing call chinese-chinese? we have chinese han, chinese turks, chinese yao, etc... so? what is chinese? perhaps, the closest i can relate to is that the term chinese is used very loosely to refer to people who's ancestors hails from central asia. then again this is also vague. it did not fully address the dimension of time. there is also no clear geographical boundaries to where is central asia. so, my take about the whole concept chinese is at best vague. and as for "pure chinese" - it does not exist.
thus, if anyone wants to look for a pure chinese or chooses to discriminate against chinese that are "not pure", it does not differ much from a person in denial and choosing to self-console by imagining the existence of a state of being that does not exist. or perhaps, it reflects the person's superficiality, insecurities, bias, ignorance, or worst still, absolute stupidity. such a person needs to reflect deeper and do some very critical thinking about what he says... no? so much reflections for a post that i again, throw into my spam box. and i repeat, my blog is for all to read. it is in a public domain. read if you want, don't read if what i post is not to your liking, but buck off and don't try to tell me what to blog. i maintain that i write what i want to write. it is my blog!
ps: for the record, mak saya orang peranakan dari singapura, dan bapak saya orang hokien dari cina. does that make me any less chinese? i don't know how you are gonna classify that, but i am happy with what i am, who cares what you brand me - chinese, malay, baba, hokkien, singaporean... whatever... i don't care. cos i am very happy with what i am. be happy! drop a high five comment if you agree with what i wrote!
picture from http://danielayad.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/hungrygeneration-pursuitofpurityprt2355.jpg